A few weeks ago I was asked to come to a “New Faculty Forum” and give a talk on this topic. Always keen to follow my own advice, my initial reaction was to Just Say No – after all it takes time to prepare these things, and the timing of the actual session was right in the middle of my office hours for undergraduate students. However, it was a friend that asked – the friend who originally suggested that I write this blog, in fact – so it took me only a microsecond to decide to say “yes” instead.
Attending the forum was instructive for me, as there were two other speakers in addition to me (the old fart): one was a fairly new prof and the other a more mid-career level person. Their advice was very different from mine – in fact they mentioned (more than a few times) how they approached things differently than me – which just goes to show you: we never stop learning in this job – even an old prof can learn some new tricks.
Here’s the advice that I offered to the group…
Today I am re-blogging a guest post I did for SoapboxScience (a community guest blog from nature.com). It appeared today as part of their Beginnings series. Hope you find it useful! Check out the nature.com blogs for terrific info.
Many thanks to Nature for inviting me to write a guest post for the “Beginnings” series. I’ve been asked to offer advice to young academics who are facing the daunting task of writing their first grant proposal. This is a broad topic and, to a great extent, the specific approach is highly dependent upon the agency you’re targeting with your application. In that context, it’s critical to read the instructions they provide. Apparently, ~80% of people don’t do that. Amazing! However, beyond that, there are some general tips that apply universally and that’s what I’ll be focusing on today.
Preparation of a successful grant proposal generally requires the ability to communicate effectively with two entirely different audiences. You want to come across as knowledgeable to the reviewers who are experts in your area, but you also need to be understandable to those members of the review committee who may have little or no related expertise. Most people make the mistake of catering only to the former, when it is the latter group that typically carries the weight in the decision, simply because there are many more of them.
Fortunately, it is actually pretty easy to satisfy the experts in your area. You do this by: Continue reading